The greatest Debate of the Decade
Kristen Flint ‘14
lobal warming is a huge point
of contention in our society for
years, plus the extreme sights
from both equally sides of the discussion have
changed the subject of global warming from a factual theory into a mythical idea. At one serious, those who consider themselves " green” bemoan the tragedy that man is triggering our globe's
climate to heat up as the other side
of the debate refuses to believe that any portion
of the global warming theory. Lurking behind
both thoughts, there is generally confusion,
misconception, and an over-all lack
of knowledge. The theory that global
heating has anthropogenic causes provides
existed for over a century, and scientists include collected proof on climatic change for over forty five years. In spite
of the proof, the public generally
lives in the dark, constantly wondering if perhaps global warming is usually fact or perhaps fiction. Global warming is the embrace
the Earth's temperature brought on by increased emission of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (1). The greenhouse
gases, which include CO2, type a quilt
in the Globe's atmosphere that traps
warmth and causes global temperatures
to increase (1). This theory of global
warming was first offered by a Swedish chemist named Svante Arrhenius in 1896 (2). Arrhenius estimated that
" doubling the level of carbon dioxide in
the atmosphere would enhance the mean
global temperature by several degrees”
(2). Even then, his audience was skeptical as many other factors could also impact global heat. Since Arrhenius' paper, the global warming discussion has grown convoluted as both scientists and the media have addressed the subject. Scientists observe climate
transform and publish their facts, but
then the media hypes it up in the articles
to the public. To add to the distress,
the public tends to avoid thinking much
about the topic unless of course extreme weather
occurs unexpectedly. However , inspite of
overwhelming opinions, there...
References: 1 . G. Moriarty, G. Kennedy. Cybernet. Syst. thirty five,
2 . S. Weart, M. Atom. Sci. 67, 41-50 (2011).
3. J. Durfee, J. Corbett. Nieman Studies 59,
four. S. Quiring, GeoJournal seventy, 1-3 (2007).
Int. 35, 390-401 (2009).
6. G. Pockley, Australasian Science twenty-eight, 28-31
7. J. Rose, L. Geologist. Assoc. 121, 334-341
almost 8. S. Wang, Chinese Sci. Bull. fifty-five, 1961-1962
9. To. Moore, EMBO Reports 9, S41-S45 (2008).
10. H. Sherwood, Australasian Science 30,
11. R. Spencer, Cultural Science and Public
Plan 44, 45-50 (2007).